Wednesday, December 13, 2017

unlocking the power of hate

Never underestimate the power of hatred. Or more specifically, never underestimate the positive effects of being hated.

Take the Jews. How on Earth could they have survived as a distinct ethnic/religious/cultural group through the 2,000 years of the Diaspora? The answer is simple. They survived by being hated.

The Jews maintained their own traditions and beliefs and ethnic identity because they were regarded as outsiders, and regarded with suspicion and dislike. Most of the time they weren’t actually persecuted or even hated but simply looked upon with suspicion. But there were times when they were actively hated and persecuted and this proved to be their salvation as a people. They were not only considered to be outsiders, they thought of themselves as outsiders.

This was a powerful incentive to avoid what was in fact the greatest threat to their survival - marrying outside their own community.

It strengthened their faith and it made their traditions seem very precious indeed.

Other cultural groups have benefited from being hated, although none so spectacularly as the Jews. For centuries the Irish Catholics maintained their faith and jealously preserved a distinctive cultural identity. The force that bound them together was the oppression they suffered at the hands of the English. Then in the latter part of the 20th century the English did something very terrible. They gave up oppressing the Irish. The Irish response was immediate. They abandoned their faith, they abandoned their identity and they set about committing national suicide. Within a few decades from now the Irish will have disappeared as a distinct people.

It’s not necessary to be oppressed to enjoy these benefits. Having an external enemy who hates you and wants to destroy you can be almost as good.

It’s worth taking a bit of a look at the history of Christianity. In its early centuries it suffered sporadic persecution at the hands of the Romans. These were boom times for Christianity.

By the 4th century AD Christianity was the official religion of the Empire but luckily there were still plenty of enemies. Most of Europe was still pagan. Even within the Empire paganism was down but not out. When the Empire in the West collapsed it was by no means certain that Christianity would triumph. The surviving Empire in the East had plenty of very real non-Christian enemies. And would soon have a new and very formidable enemy in the shape of Islam. Islam would even threaten the territories of the now-defunct western Empire.

For centuries to come Christianity would have real enemies and Christians with a taste for martyrdom could find endless opportunities for indulging that taste.

The boom times came to an end at the end of the seventeenth century. The Islamic threat to Europe was over. European Christianity had no viable enemies. And Christianity began its long slow decline.

The interesting bit is that the boom times might soon be back. Liberals (and I use liberals as shorthand for the globalist elites and their SJW foot soldiers) have hated Christianity for a long long time but up till now they’ve been content with harassment. This is clearly going to change, probably within the next decade. They’re going to move towards full-blown persecution.

This may be the salvation of Christianity. Being a persecuted minority once again might lead to a Christian revival. At the very least it should eliminate most of the mainstream churches, and that would be a very good thing indeed for Christianity.


  1. We’re persecuted even now online [see net neutrality], elite control of speech.

    1. We’re persecuted even now online

      Yes, it's already begun. It's going to get significantly worse and I expect it to happen rather quickly. So far there has been zero effective organised resistance and the anti-Christian forces can smell blood.

      I wonder how far it will have to go before "Christians" like Justin Welby notice?

      Or perhaps it might be more pertinent to ask, how long before "Christians" like Justin Welby drop the mask and stop pretending to be Christians and openly join the oppressors?

      It will be interesting to watch. In previous persecutions there were bitter divisions between those who compromised and those who stood by their faith.

    2. Excuse me, but if abolition of net neutrality is a pro-elite thing, why would Trump administration, which is presumably not liberal, initiate it, and California State Senator, who is presumably liberal, would try and fight it? And why would liberals protest against it, as they apparently do now, if it suits them greatly?

    3. why would Trump administration, which is presumably not liberal

      You do have to remember that the Republicans are liberals, just like the Democrats.

    4. You can always be relied upon for a different way of looking at things. Very often it adds to my considerations. The Irish example is a good one, but it does isolate a 'cause' (British desistance) to the exclusion of any other influence. What part did Riverdance play, I wonder. The Irish, as a 'people' are quite mad, but even mad people take a day off from time to time. Perhaps they are just quietly dribbling in a corner.

      Thinks would be very different today if the severe and stiff Jean has warmed even just a little to that American-irish fellow.

  2. >>You do have to remember that the Republicans are liberals, just like the Democrats.

    Not all of them, apparently. I highly doubt that Google, Apple, and Facebook would protest against a policy designed to enforce liberal paradigm even further. But they do. Which probably means that the abolition of net neutrality might be an instrument for Trump to fight liberal media machine, which can barely be defeated any other way.