Wednesday, May 30, 2018

SJWs and globalists - who actually pulls the strings?

The culture war is a war that was launched by powerful vested interests but they are not the ones who actually fought the war. The bankers and billionaires and senior deep state functionaries (the globalists who could be described as the Inner Party) left the conduct of the war largely to journalists, academics, politicians and so-called activists. These were the Social Justice foot soldiers. They could be described as the Outer Party.

It was an arrangement that worked very well. The globalists wanted to ensure that populations were demoralised and easily controlled, with no loyalties and no stable beliefs. They wanted willing consumers, and compliant cheap labour. They therefore wanted traditional institutions such as the family and the churches destroyed. Their SJW foot soldiers were eager to oblige.

So far so good. The one minor problem is the quality of the human material from which the SJW foot soldiers are drawn. Feminists, homosexuals, transgenders, environmentalists - these people are fundamentally unstable. Many are in fact mentally ill. This phenomenon is one that Spandrell has addressed in his recent extremely stimulating posts on bio-leninism here and here and here.

The mental instability of these people makes them useful in many ways since it predisposes them towards fanaticism but it also makes them difficult to control. When you’re using feminists as a weapon for example then you have to be aware that you’re dealing with an unguided missile. The globalists are happy to use feminists to attack Christians and white men (preferably working-class white men) but the recent #metoo fiascos where feminists have targeted black men and even elite Jews are a good illustration of the dangers. In fact the dangers in this case are even greater since you’re not just dealing with feminists but also with actresses who are even more unstable and narcissistic than everyday feminists. Your chances of trying to reason with Hollywood feminists are very very poor. These Hollywood feminists can smell blood in the water and they are in no mood to pick and choose their victims carefully.

This is likely to be more and more of a problem. The globalists have given seriously crazy people a great deal of power to destroy and they’re hoping they can direct that destruction against their enemies, but those crazy people get crazier as they get more power and as they get the taste for blood. They’re likely to be increasingly difficult to control. The results will be interesting to watch.

11 comments:

  1. Whether with among Leftists is intended or not (a feature or a buig) all depends on what you believe They are trying to achieve.

    I believe we are in a spiritual warfare, the objective of which is a state of all against all, each against each, universal fear and resentment.

    So, what you describe is not an accident at the highest level, rather it is hoped-for/ planned/ intended by 'the controllers'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe we are in a spiritual warfare, the objective of which is a state of all against all, each against each, universal fear and resentment.

      So, what you describe is not an accident at the highest level, rather it is hoped-for/ planned/ intended by 'the controllers'.


      Could be. My suspicion is that the controllers want the conditions you've described, but they want to be able to switch those conditions on and off at will. Or at the very least, they want to be able to exercise some control.

      It's a bit like the Chinese Cultural Revolution. When it had served its purpose Mao wanted to be able to bring it to a halt (and he was able to do so).

      Delete
    2. I think Bruce means the "controllers" are supernatural evil forces. So feminists turning on the people who unleashed them is not a bug but a feature, part of the demonic plan to make everyone hate and distrust everyone else.

      I tend to agree with this.

      AaronB

      Delete
  2. I can't see how their madness is a problem for those who use them. They're being used for destruction, not for creation. You don't need to control the loons to make them destroy things. I think they're doing great actually. And if some of them would disappear or become unhappy in the process, no one would ever care - no one would even know, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They're being used for destruction, not for creation.

      Yes, true enough, but what if the various groups that make up the coalition of the cultural left start turning their destructive urges against each other? These groups really don't have anything much in common apart from their craziness and hate.

      Delete
    2. And again: who cares if they do? Do you think Soros or the Clintons would sob if pro-trans feminists would eat the whole of anti-trans feminists alive? I really don't think so.

      Delete
    3. And by the way, yes, they don't have much in common, but they also don't have a lot of differences. As far as I understand, there's just this pro- and anti-trans feminists and this LGBT vs. Muslims tension. Two conflicts is just not enough to bury this whole bloody thing.

      Delete
    4. And by the way, yes, they don't have much in common, but they also don't have a lot of differences.

      True. One of the clever if depressing insights in Spandrell's bio-leninism theory is that these SJW foot soldiers are absolutely loyal to their masters because they don't have a choice. They're people who are incapable of making it in the real world. They can only survive in the artificial bureaucratic sheltered workshop world of social justice activism. They're social justice activists because there are no other jobs they would be capable of doing.

      It's the very poor quality of the human material that guarantees their loyalty.

      Delete
    5. I don't know about the West, but in Russia I tend to encounter a lot of good professionals in plenty of trades, who, unfortunately, gravitate towards SJWism in their political views. Unfortunately, a good professional isn't necessary a smart person.

      Delete
    6. but in Russia I tend to encounter a lot of good professionals in plenty of trades, who, unfortunately, gravitate towards SJWism in their political views.

      Yes, but those are people for whom politics is not their whole lives. They'll adopt the dominant political beliefs because it makes life easier and helps their careers. Most people simply conform. If they live in a communist state they'll cheer for communism. If they lived in a fascist state they'd cheer for fascism. If they lived in an absolutist monarchy they'd cheer for absolutist monarchy.

      I'm talking about the professional activist types, the ones who are in Mickey Mouse academic fields like gender studies, or they're full-time paid activists, or they're third-rate journalists who get jobs by being loyal to the party line, or they're lower and middle grade political hacks, or bureaucrats. These are the people who are the full-time SJW foot soldiers. They're loyal because they're otherwise unemployable.

      Delete