Saturday, November 4, 2017

the Hollywood sex scandals

I’ve avoided the subject of the recent sex scandals in Hollywood involving Harvey Weinstein and others but since I have a particular interest in the nexus between popular culture and politics I probably do need to address this issue. It’s actually a rather complicated issue which sheds some fascinating light on the sorry state of our culture in general.

The first point to be made is that it’s absurd for anyone to pretend to be surprised by any of this. This is how Hollywood has always worked. If you want a part in a movie you have to be nice to powerful people like producers and everyone in Hollywood has always known exactly what that means. Any aspiring actress (or actor) who arrives in Tinsel Town hoping to be a star knows what he or she will have to do to achieve that aim. If the price is unacceptable then the smart move is to forget being a star and keep away from Hollywood. In the unlikely event that you are really are naïve enough to be unaware of this reality then within about ten minutes of getting off the bus you’re going to figure it out. If you don’t like the idea, get back on that bus.

As 1940s Hollywood star Hedy Lamarr put it, “The ladder of success in Hollywood is usually a press agent, actor, director, producer, leading man; and you are a star if you sleep with each of them in that order. Crude, but true.”

Obviously it’s a different situation with child actors, and one of the reasons the allegations of homosexual predation in Hollywood are more disturbing is that they do involve children. In these cases it’s a matter of parental responsibility. If you want your kid to be a star then unless you’re prepared to watch him like a hawk it’s almost certain he’ll attract the attention of these predators. Of course these days parental responsibility is pretty much an unknown concept.

I’m certainly not trying to get sleazy Hollywood producers off the hook. There’s no doubt that Hollywood is, and always has been, full of sleazebags who use their power to have sex with pretty starlets. It’s totally reprehensible and obviously morally wrong. It is however worth bearing in mind that where such incidents involve actresses who are legally adults then there is highly likely to be fault on both sides. Hollywood attracts sleazy men but it also attracts women who are willing, sometimes even eager, to trade their sexual favours for career advancement. We need to be wary of falling for the feminist line that women have no agency. If an actress is of legal age and she’s willing to have sex with a producer to get a film role then she must accept her fair share of the responsibility. The trouble with Hollywood is that it’s corrupt all the way through and it corrupts everybody, literally everybody, that it touches.

It’s noticeable that actresses who make accusations of sexual harassment usually seem to do so only years later when it’s becoming obvious that their careers are fading. As long as they think there’s still a chance to hang on to their dreams of stardom they tend to keep their mouths shut. One can’t help suspecting that at the time of the alleged events they were in fact perfectly willing to trade sex for stardom. We need to keep in mind that in spite of the lies of feminists it is extremely common for women to sleep their way to the top (and not just in Hollywood).

The other important point to remember is that at this stage what we have are a great many allegations of the he said/she said variety. Such allegations are by their very nature unprovable. Unfortunately in most cases in which allegations are made against public figures they are of this type. Even more unfortunately it is by no means unknown for people to be convicted of an offence even when it is a matter of one person’s word against another’s. There have been cases in which convictions have been obtained on the basis of very questionable evidence.

It is particularly dangerous to accept accusations in situations where no charges have even been laid. It’s sad that many on the Right have been so excited by the prospect of watching the suffering of Hollywood liberals that they have lost sight of the importance of the presumption of innocence. Even Hollywood scum are entitled to the presumption of innocence.  It’s quite possible that most of the accusations are actually true, but it’s equally possible that many are quite untrue. We live in a society that offers generous rewards to anyone making accusations of sexual misconduct against public figures. It is all part of the corruption of our society.

Obviously anything that makes Hollywood look bad is to be welcomed but we must be aware that this situation is going to be spun in a way that supports the narrative. In this case it’s going to be spun to support a particularly vicious part of the feminist narrative, that women need never take responsibility and that everything is always the fault of those evil patriarchal white heterosexual males.

6 comments:

  1. I chuckled when LGBT accused Spacey of coming out in the context of child abuse, meaning you can speak out loud about your homosexuality in positive context, but if the context is inappropriate you must shut up about your sexual orientation for good. Gay people can't be bad because they're gay, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gay people can't be bad because they're gay, right?

      Yep. We must never ever mention male homosexuality and child abuse together because there's absolutely no connection between the two. All child abusers are evil heterosexual men. The fact that even though homosexuals are 1% of the population but male homosexuals make up 40% of sex offenders against children is just a wicked hatefact.

      Delete
    2. By the way, speaking of loonies, I always wanted to ask what you think about the crazy cult of vegetarianism. Is it just a subgroup of green nazis? I mean, we don't really have a lot of them here in Russia, so they look kinda exotic when they're extreme.

      Delete
    3. By the way, speaking of loonies, I always wanted to ask what you think about the crazy cult of vegetarianism.

      Crazy cult sums them up perfectly. It's another substitute religion, and it attracts a particularly irritating type of virtue-signaller.

      It's one of many silly health-obsessed and virtue-obsessed cults that appeared in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a time when western civilisation was starting to run off the rails in a big way. It's a bit like nudism which oddly enough is, like vegetarianism, a puritan cult.

      Delete
  2. You say all that needs to be said, and say it clearly and even diplomatically. This is an excellent piece.

    In this Valley of Tears, there are swamps and pits of depravity, not just the occasional thorn bush or stone to trip over. Those swamps and pits though are signposted as swimming pools.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point of women taking responsibility is a crucial one.

    ReplyDelete